EXCEPTIONAL GENIOUS ONLY

Homework 1 

 

xid-1792751_1.png

 The Annotated Bibliography  

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate progress in compiling research and to indicate a methodology for organizing research sources. 

Recommended: Before you begin, review chapters 4 – 6 in A Pocket Style Manual (APA).

Include the following in your annotated bibliography:

  • APA citations and annotations for four (4) sources you deem relevant to your problem statement (thesis).

For each source:

  • Cite the source in proper APA format. The citations should be organized in alphabetical order by author as in an APA References page. 
  • Follow with a brief annotation that summarizes the source (approximately 3 – 5 sentences). You may quote from the source, but do not copy and paste from the abstract. 
  • In 1 or 2 sentences, explain and evaluate the source’s relevance and significance to your hypothesis. Does this support or discredit your hypothesis?  
  • Use an academic tone and style. 

Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.

 

 

***** I need this homework by Wednesday please******

 

 

Homework 2 

 

xid-1792751_1.png

 Public Policy Meeting Assignment

 Submit a 3-4 page summary paper on the public policy meeting. Include headings in your paper that address these components:

  • The purpose of the meeting, key participants, key agenda items, and meeting logistics
  • Background information and a description about the committee
  • One specific topic that was discussed at the meeting and an explanation of the committee process
  • An analysis of the key stakeholder positions related to the topic discussed
  • Key interactions that occurred at the meeting
  • Outcomes of the meeting including the specific topic focus
  • APA format (6th ed.), proper grammar, and references as appropriate

 

**** I need it for saturday**********

P1

Hello i need a Good and Positive Comment related with this argument .A paragraph  with no more  100 words.

 

 

Lorelei Martin 

 

1 posts

 

Re:Topic 5 DQ 1

 

Research that incorporates both quantitative and qualitative data is termed “mixed method”. Using a mixed method research methodology gives a more complete and synergistic use of data than collection and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data separately (AHRQ, 2013). Mixed method research methodology gives breadth and depth of understanding while offsetting the weaknesses innate to using quantitative or qualitative approaches individually. “Triangulation” a term coined in the 1970’s to describe mixed methodology, “was identified as a combination of methodologies in the study of the same phenomenon to decrease the bias inherent in using one particular method” (Doorenbos, 2014).

 

There are various mixed method designs and selection of appropriate design is important prior to implementation of research. When using the convergent design, quantitative and qualitative data is collected at the same time. It is analyzed separately and compared and displayed side by side. The two types of data validate each other and form a solid basis for drawing conclusions of interventions. The explanatory sequel design involves two phases. The first being a quantitative study followed by a qualitative study that builds on the quantitative. In this way, the qualitative data gives further explanation of the quantitative data. The embedded design is a quantitative outcomes study, for example a randomized, controlled trial, in which qualitative data collection and analysis is added. Both quantitative and qualitative data are analyzed and the qualitative incorporated at the outset to aid in developing interventions. The multi-phase design, for example a community-based approach that involves the primary care providers and staff, patients, and other providers and individuals in the community in the research process. Key stakeholders participate as co-researchers in a project, providing input about their needs, ways to address them, and ways to implement changes (AHRQ, 2013).

 

There are both advantages and disadvantages to using a mixed method research methodology.

 

Advantages:

 

  • Compares quantitative and qualitative data to aid in understanding contradictions between quantitative and qualitative findings.
  • Reflects participants’ point of view by giving a voice to study participants and ensure that study findings are grounded in participants’ experiences.
  • Fosters scholarly interaction by adding breadth to multidisciplinary team research by encouraging the interaction of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods scholars.
  • Provides methodological flexibility and adaptability to many study designs to illuminate more information than can be obtained in quantitative research alone.
  • Collects rich, comprehensive data by mirroring the way individuals naturally collect information (integrating quantitative and qualitative data). For example, sports stories frequently integrate quantitative data (scores or number of errors) with qualitative data (descriptions and images of highlights) to provide a more complete story than either method would alone.

 

Disadvantages:

 

  • Increases the complexity of evaluations. Mixed methods studies require careful planning to describe all aspects of research such as: study sample for qualitative and quantitative portions, sequence of quantitative and qualitative portions, and plan for integrating data. Integrating quantitative and qualitative data is often challenging.
  • Relies on a multidisciplinary team of researchers using qualitative experts.
  • Requires increased resources. Mixed methods studies are labor intensive. They require greater resources and time than those needed to conduct a single method study.

 

 

 

class 1 comment 2

Hamric’s model of advanced practice nursing was created in 1996 and is composed of seven core components (Hamric, 2014). The three elements of Hamric’s definition of advanced nursing practice that I think are most important are; collaboration, evidence-based practice and leadership.

   Initially, collaboration is important in nursing practice because in our field we have to collaborate with each other every day to give the patient the best care possible. Communicating with the attending doctors, nursing assistants and other staff members can ensure for a more positive outcome for patients. If we don’t work together as a team and collaborate with each other the patients are not going to receive the treatment they need in a timely fashion.

   Secondly, evidence-based practice is also a key element for advanced practice nursing. The three main components of EBP, research, clinical expertise and patient preferences can help improve outcomes (Understanding Evidence-Based Practice, 2016). By following this, proven research allows for a quicker and more affective diagnosis and treatment of patients.

   Lastly, leadership as other elements of Hamric’s models of advanced practice nursing is a crucial piece for advanced nursing. A good leader is focused on what is best for patients, staff and their organization. Doing so will ensure better outcomes and satisfaction in the work place for both patients and staff.

 

References 

Hamric, A.,Hanson, C., Tracy, M., & O’Grady, E. (2014). Advanced Practice Nursing: An Integrative Approach. (5thed.). St. Louis: Sanders

Understanding Evidence-Based Practice. (2016). Retrieved May 20, 2017, from http://www.nursingcenter.com/evidencebasedpracticenetwork/home/tools-resources/collections/understandingevidencebasedpractice.aspx

 

 
Filter by:
|

Clear filters