Assignment 1 and 2

Assignment 1: Topic Selection and Proposal

Due Week 2 and worth 150 points

 

The topic for the Research Project should be selected in Week 1 and delivered by the end of Week 2. Students should choose a topic that interests and challenges them, one that they see as a problem or challenge. In order to satisfy the requirements, students must select a topic from the textbook, explain why they chose the topic, and describe the intent of the research. The Topic Selection and Proposal assignment further provides students with an opportunity to receive feedback from the instructor before completing additional work.

 

Information at the following link is helpful in completing this assignment: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/658/03/

 

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

1.     Select a topic from the textbook that you want to explore in greater depth.

2.     Provide an explanation as to why the topic needs to be researched and the problems and challenges that exist.

3.     Analyze the topic, and describe the intended outcome of your research.

4.     Describe the approach or actions that you will take in conducting your research.

5.     Use at least three (3) scholarly sources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia, Ask.com, Answers.com, Freedictionary.com, and other open source Websites do not qualify as scholarly.

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must conform to the APA formatting requirements. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Points: 150

Assignment 1: Topic Selection and Proposal

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Select a topic from the textbook that you want to explore in greater depth.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely selected a topic from the textbook that you want to explore in greater depth.

Insufficiently selected a topic from the textbook that you want to explore in greater depth.

Partially selected a topic from the textbook that you want to explore in greater depth.

Satisfactorily selected a topic from the textbook that you want to explore in greater depth.

Thoroughly selected a topic from the textbook that you want to explore in greater depth.

2. Provide an explanation as to why the topic needs to be researched and the problems and challenges that exist.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely provided an explanation as to why the topic needs to be researched and the problems and challenges that exist.

Insufficiently provided an explanation as to why the topic needs to be researched and the problems and challenges that exist.

Partially provided an explanation as to why the topic needs to be researched and the problems and challenges that exist.

Satisfactorily provided an explanation as to why the topic needs to be researched and the problems and challenges that exist.

Thoroughly provided an explanation as to why the topic needs to be researched and the problems and challenges that exist.

3. Analyze the topic, and describe the intended outcome of your research.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the topic, and did not submit or incompletely described the intended outcome of your research.

Insufficiently analyzed the topic, and insufficiently described the intended outcome of your research.

Partially analyzed the topic, and partially described the intended outcome of your research.

Satisfactorily analyzed the topic, and satisfactorily described the intended outcome of your research.

Thoroughly analyzed the topic, and thoroughly described the intended outcome of your research.

4. Describe the approach or actions that you will take in conducting your research.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely described the approach or actions that you will take in conducting your research.

Insufficiently described the approach or actions that you will take in conducting your research.

Partially described the approach or actions that you will take in conducting your research t.

Satisfactorily described the approach or actions that you will take in conducting your research.

Thoroughly described the approach or actions that you will take in conducting your research.

5. Conform to the APA formatting standards.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely conformed to the APA formatting standards.

Insufficiently conformed to the APA formatting standards.

Partially conformed to the APA formatting standards.

Satisfactorily conformed to the APA formatting standards.

Thoroughly conformed to the APA formatting standards.

6. 3 references

Weight: 10%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

7. Display accurate spelling, punctuation, and grammar and write in a clear and organized manner.

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present


Assignment 2: Formal Outline

Due Week 4 and worth 150 points

 

The purpose of the Formal Outline is for students to organize their research and show the topical areas that they will cover throughout the Research Project. By breaking down the literature into various sections, topics, sub-topics, and details, students can divide large amounts of data into smaller, more orderly sections. The Formal Outline helps students organize their thoughts, stay on topic, and follow a logical order. It also provides students with the opportunity to show a progression of thought and direction, and can highlight specific areas of the Research Project that may need more or less attention.  

 

The following article is helpful in structuring the paper: http://explorable.com/research-paper-outline-examples

 

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. Provide an Introduction, Body, and Conclusion.
  2. Identify the main points and sections of the Research Project.
  3. Identify the sub-topics and details consistent with the main points and sections.
  4. Present information in an organized and logical manner.
  5. Use at least three (3) new scholarly sources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia, Ask.com, Answers.com, Freedictionary.com, and other open source Websites do not qualify as scholarly.

Points: 150

Assignment 2: Formal Outline

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Provide an Introduction, Body, and Conclusion.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely provided an Introduction, Body, and Conclusion.

Insufficiently provided an Introduction, Body, and Conclusion.

Partially provided an Introduction, Body, and Conclusion.

Satisfactorily provided an Introduction, Body, and Conclusion.

Thoroughly provided an Introduction, Body, and Conclusion.

2. Identify the main points and sections of the Research Project.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely identified the main points and sections of the Research Project.

Insufficiently identified the main points and sections of the Research Project.

Partially identified the main points and sections of the Research Project.

Satisfactorily identified the main points and sections of the Research Project.

Thoroughly identified the main points and sections of the Research Project.

3. Identify the sub-topics and details consistent with the main points and sections.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely identified the sub-topics and details consistent with the main points and sections.

Insufficiently identified the sub-topics and details consistent with the main points and sections.

Partially identified the sub-topics and details consistent with the main points and sections.

Satisfactorily identified the sub-topics and details consistent with the main points and sections.

Thoroughly identified the sub-topics and details consistent with the main points and sections.

4. Present information in an organized and logical manner.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely presented information in an organized and logical manner.

Insufficiently presented information in an organized and logical manner.

Partially presented information in an organized and logical manner.

Satisfactorily presented information in an organized and logical manner.

Thoroughly presented information in an organized and logical manner.

5. Conform to the APA formatting standards.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely conformed to the APA formatting standards.

Insufficiently conformed to the APA formatting standards.

Partially conformed to the APA formatting standards.

Satisfactorily conformed to the APA formatting standards.

Thoroughly conformed to the APA formatting standards.

6. 3 references

Weight: 10%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

7. Display accurate spelling, punctuation, and grammar and write in a clear and organized manner.

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Need done Asap

Season 1, Episode 1: “Life and Stuff”  

 

Season 1, Episode 2: “We’re in the Money”

 

Season 1, Episode 19: “Workin’ Overtime”

 

Season 1, Episode 23: “Let’s Call It Quits”

 

 

 

Season 1, Episode 2 of 3rd Rock shows Mary and Dick attending a traditional wedding ceremony.  Dick is mesmerized by the ritual that unfolds.  Think about the typical American wedding.  What issues seem strange? Why the need for superstitions (“Something borrowed, something blue” and so on)?  Which family traditionally pays for the event? Why?  Has the wedding industry become a monster?

 

 

must be at least 200 words need done by 6:00 pm east time

Understanding the patterns of others

Please use ORIGINAL work…………. NO PLAGERISM

 

LCI Scores:

Sequence (31) use first.

Precise (25) use first.

Technical (18) as needed

Confluent (22) as needed

 

 

Do You Think? from Jeff Bennett on Vimeo. This video has no audio other than instrumental music.

 
Prepare Icon Prepare: One of the main purposes of a college education is to challenge ourselves to use higher levels of reasoning and thinking skills. Critical thinking involves being able to solve a problem, examine information from several different perspectives, and resolve conflicts. In addition to critically reading Chapter 3 of your textbook, watch the Do You Think? video for another perspective on critical thinking. You will need to review the concepts of Pattern Conflict and Pattern Bias in the Week Three Instructor Guidance.
 
Reflect Icon Reflect: Take time to reflect on those who play an important role in your life and think about how their Learning Patterns are similar to or different from yours. A heightened awareness of the similarities and differences between yourself and others around you is a critical component in the process of becoming an intentional learner.
 
Write Icon Write: Address each part of the discussion below:

  • Pick one adult in your life you regularly interact with. Using your knowledge of the Learning Patterns, guess their level of use for each Pattern and support your reasoning by providing specific examples of how the person you identified uses each Learning Pattern. Note: If you prefer to give them the LCI, please download the instructions. This version is appropriate for individuals ages 16 and up.
  • List your LCI scores to remind us of your own Learning Patterns.
  • Provide an example that demonstrates how Learning Patterns play (or have played) a role in your interactions with the person you selected. Consider which Learning Pattern(s) help you connect and work positively with this person and conversely, which Pattern(s) have contributed to or have the potential to lead to Pattern Conflict.

Your initial post should contain a minimum of 250 words.

 
Discuss Icon Respond to Peers: Review your classmates’ posts and respond to at least two of your peers. Consider identifying other areas of potential Pattern Conflict that they may not have considered. Provide additional advice on how they could improve or maximize their relationships with the person they have identified. Each response should be a minimum of 50 words.

Assignment 2: Employment-At-Will Doctrine

Imagine you are a recently-hired Chief Operating Officer (COO) in a midsize company preparing for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). You quickly discover multiple personnel problems that require your immediate attention.

  1. John posted a rant on his Facebook page in which he criticized the company’s most important customer.
  2. Ellen started a blog to protest the CEO’s bonus, noting that no one below director has gotten a raise in two (2) years and portraying her bosses as “know-nothings” and “out-of-touch”
  3. Bill has been using his company-issued BlackBerry to run his own business on the side.
  4. After being disciplined for criticizing a customer in an email (sent from his personal email account on a company computer), Joe threatens to sue the company for invasion of privacy.
  5. One of the department supervisors requests your approval to fire his secretary for insubordination. Since the secretary has always received glowing reviews, you call her into your office and determine that she has refused to prepare false expense reports for her boss.
  6. Anna’s boss refused to sign her leave request for jury duty and now wants to fire her for being absent without permission.

As an astute manager, you will need to analyze the employment-at-will doctrine and determine what, if any, exceptions and liabilities exist before taking any action. As you proceed with your investigation, you discover the company has no whistleblower policy.

In preparation for this assignment, use the Internet or Strayer Library to research your state’s employment-at-will policy.

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Summarize the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text and then evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining:
    1. Whether you can legally fire the employee; include an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.
    2. The primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; specify the ethical theory that best supports your decision.
  2. Examine your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Analyze at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Include a summary of the main issue and the outcome in the identified real-world example.
  3. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze and apply the concepts of freedom versus responsibility and ethical decision making.
  • Analyze and evaluate laws that protect against discrimination in the workplace.
  • Analyze and evaluate the employment-at-will doctrine and exceptions, as well as the protections afforded whistleblowers.
  • Explore the legal and ethical issues surrounding employee and consumer privacy.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in law, ethics, and corporate governance.
  • Write clearly and concisely about law, ethics, and corporate governance using proper writing mechanics.

Assignment 2: Employment-At-Will Doctrine

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Summarize the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text.

Partially summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text.

Satisfactorily summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text.

Thoroughly summarized the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text.

1a. Evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; include an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; did not submit or incompletely included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.

Partially evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; partially included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.

Satisfactorily evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; satisfactorily included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.

Thoroughly evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining whether you can legally fire the employee; thoroughly included an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine.

1b. Evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; specify which ethical theory best supports your decision.
Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should taketo limit liability and impact on operations; did not submit or incompletely specified which ethical theory best supports your decision.

Partially evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; partially specified which ethical theory best supports your decision.

Satisfactorily evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; satisfactorily specified which ethical theory best supports your decision.

Thoroughly evaluated three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining the primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; thoroughly specified which ethical theory best supports your decision.

2. Examine your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Analyze at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Include a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Did not submit or incompletely included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example.

Partially examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Partially analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Partially included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example.

Satisfactorily examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Satisfactorily analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Satisfactorily included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example.

Thoroughly examined your state’s policy on employment-at-will. Thoroughly analyzed at least one (1) real-world example of an employee or employer utilizing your state’s employment-at-will doctrine in the last five (5) years. Thoroughly included a summary of the main issue and outcome in the identified real-world example.

3. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

 

Additional instructions:

Paper should be about the state of Georgia

Title page must have running head

Title of paper must start with page 1

All remaining pages must have title of paper and page number on the right side of the pages.

3 quality academic references

Peer-reviewed articles only

No www websites in the paper

 

 

Assignment #1: Making an Ethical Decision

Making an Ethical Decision

Instructions

 

  Making an Ethical Decision

In this assignment, students will respond to a short case study demonstrating an understanding of an ethical dilemma and the ethical theories presented in the course. 

 

Required Elements  – Making an Ethical Decision:

·        Read critically and analyze the scenario provided;

·        Answer the question, “What would you do?;”

·        To answer the question, students must identify the ethical dilemma;

·        Apply at least three theories to make the decision;

·        Compare and contrast your results using the three theories;

·        Choose the result that you consider to be the best resolution of the dilemma and explain why;

 

Required Formatting of Assignment #1:

·        This paper should be double-spaced, 12-point font, and three to four pages in length excluding the title page and reference page;

·        Title page;

·        Introductory paragraph and a summary paragraph;

·        Use headings to demarcate your discussion;

·        Write in the third person;

·        Use APA formatting for in-text citations and a reference page.  You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary;

·        Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.

 

 

Scenario:

Jill Jones is a bright 45-year-old woman who is the vice-president of sales in a mid-sized family owned Candy Corporation.  She began her career at the company right out of high school, and over the years earned two college degrees while working her way up the organizational ladder.

One day, Jill was stunned to learn that the firm’s head, William Potter, was considering placing his oldest son, Henry, in the position of CEO while he became chairman of the board. Years earlier, when Jill was in a middle management position, Henry had unsuccessfully propositioned her and made her life miserable. She had never mentioned the incident to anyone and had put it behind her when he was promoted to head the Miami branch of the business.  However, now as she looks at William Potter she becomes even more shocked to hear him say” I can’t be objective about him Jill, You have always been so loyal to the company and successful in hiring excellent people for the sales force I want you to review him objectively and give me your recommendation.” Conflicting thoughts rush through her mind, the awful past, the all so possible awful future with him as her boss, the clear knowledge that he has done a great job with the Miami branch, and of course the knowledge that he is the bosses son. What should she do?

 

“Jill” has just come up against one of the myriad ethical dilemmas companies of all sizes and their employees face on an ongoing basis. Deciding the best course of action might be easy in some cases, when there are clear-cut choices between “right” and “wrong.”  But there are many gray areas, like Jill’s, when it’s harder to know what the right choice is for you and your company.

 

help,,

Sammury These Cases;

1- Cohen V. California (1971).

2- New Yourk v. Ferber(1982) .                                                                                                                                      3- US v. o’brien (1968).                                                                                                                                                  4- Texas v. Johnson (1989).

 

The requirements that my professor expect from me as what is :-

The first paragraph is your introductory paragraph.  Tell me why you are writing to me and a brief synopsis of what will follow: the cases you briefed, etc.,.

Then, for each major form of participation, spend a paragraph discussing substantively that participation. For example, discuss some points about the topic. Etc. So, explain the materials carefully (I will use these paragraphs to assist in my doing a qualitative measure of your participation). If a case, tell me about the case itself AND about the contribution you made in class. Remember, this is a thoughtful documentation, reflection and representation of your oral contribution and explanation of the substance of the materials.

– Agree or Disagree with other classmate topic that they have talked about in the classroom. 

– How you correlate with your classmates.

– Free plagiarism. 

– Use your own words.

 

Form requirements:

– 4 full pages, single space, but double space between paragraphs. Add some participate that I have agree with someone with my classmate.

– Do not indent paragraphs.

– italicize or underline the names of cases.

 – 1 inch margins on all sides and typed in 12 point Times Roman font. 

– I have attached my note for these Cases and wil helps you A lot.

 

Please make sure follow these steps as what it is.

 

 

 

Fear Management and Terrorism DB3

A mass-casualty incident (MCI) creates a uniquely challenging management and coordination quagmire. These events can occur as a result of natural disasters, such as a tsunami, earthquake, or hurricane; they can be a result of an accident, such as a ferry sinking during inclement weather; or they can result from an act of violence, such as a terrorist attack like the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing or the attacks of September 11, 2001. In any case, these attacks present a unique challenge to law enforcement, emergency response teams, and government oversight. 

As you explore the different methods used to deal with MCIs, as well as the different governmental agencies that may be involved, consider the following:

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas:

  • What federal and state agencies are required to deal with an MCI resulting from a terrorist attack? Why?
  • How do you distinguish between federal and state authorities for both operational and management functions? Explain.
    • How do you ensure a fusion of effort between federal and state authorities? Explain.
  • MCIs resulting from terrorist attacks are considered the purview of law enforcement. This creates a challenge during multijurisdictional MCIs. During MCIs resulting from domestic terrorism, such as the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, what law enforcement agency should have primary jurisdiction? Why?
    •  How should federal law enforcement engage state and local law enforcement for support? Why?
  • Treating long-term physical and mental health effects following any MCI can prove costly to state governments. How should the federal government work with states to ensure that proper medical and mental health is provided? Explain.
    • What federal and state organizations should be responsible for these efforts? Why?

Assignment

To complete this  assignment you must write a two-to-three page report discuss the case  below:Several months ago, WXYZ Co. CEO met with ABCD’s CEO for lunch to  discuss potential business ventures between both companies. After  several glasses of wine WXYZ’s CEO offered to buy from ABCD a 20 acre  parcel of waterfront land located in the Florida Keys. WXYZ’s purchase  offer was for $50 million but ABCD’s reply was that it would sell the  land only at $70 million. Since WXYZ had so much interest in this piece  of land, its CEO told ABCD that he would have to meet with the rest of  its board to make a decision but that he would pay ABCD $10,000 to keep  the option to buy the land open for 30 days. ABCD’s CEO, agreed and  wrote in a piece of paper that in exchange for $10,000 ABCD was giving  WXYZ the option to buy the land in question within 30 days at a $70  million price. WXYZ then gave ABCD’s CEO a $10,000 check which they  promptly cashed. On day 20th, WXYZ met and it unanimously agreed to buy  the land from ABCD at $70 million. That same day, its CEO sent ABCD’s  CEO a fax confirming that they were accepting ABCD’s offer to buy the  land. Upon receiving the fax, ABCD’s CEO called WXYZ to inform them that  the offer was off the table and that the price for the land was now $90  million which WXYZ refused to pay. Two days later billionaire Richie  Moneymaker offered to buy the land from ABCD for $100 million. WXYZ is  now demanding that ABCD honor its word and sell them the land for the  original offered price.

crj 180: Bullying: The Amanda Todd Story

Recent history illustrates that bullying is a growing problem among today’s youth in the United States.  Amanda Todd, for example, was only fifteen (15) years old when she committed suicide after being bullied by her peers for over a year. 

 

 

 

Watch the video titled “Amanda Todd’s Story: Struggling, Bullying, Suicidal, Self-harm” (8 min 55 s).                            

 

Video Source: ChisVideos. (2012, October 11). Amanda Todd’s Story: Struggling, Bullying, Suicidal,   Self-harm [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ej7afkypUsc. 

 

This video can be viewed from within your online course shell. 

 

 

 

Use your textbook, the Internet, and / or Strayer Library to research articles on bullying cases that occur today.

 

 

 

Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:

 

1.Describe at least two (2) types of bullying to which Amanda Todd was subjected.

2.Identify at least three (3) consequences that Amanda Todd experienced as a result of being bullied, and discuss her attempts to deal with them.

3.Recommend two (2) strategies that you believe Amanda’s parents, teachers, and authorities could have used in order to reduce episodes of bullying of Amanda and thus prevent Amanda’s suicide. 

4.Compare at least two (2) similarities and two (2) differences between the bullying cases that take place today with those cases that took place when you attended high school. 

5.Explain the key contributing factors that you believe led to bullying behaviors. Next, suggest at least three (3) ways in which prevention programs can reduce bullying cases overall.

6.Use at least two (2) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.  

 

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

•Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

•Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

 

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

•Explore the relationship of illicit drugs, gangs, and forms of delinquency.

•Explicate the types of prevention programs that are likely to work with high-risk youngsters.

•Use technology and information resources to research issues in juvenile delinquency and justice.

AU CRJ 510 Week 5 Assignment 1

Homeland Security Influence: Part III

This journal article review addresses criminal justice policy issues that stem from the formation of the Department of Homeland Security in 2002, such as concerns stemming from the passage of the Patriot Act. In Week Three, for Part I, you identified the journal article and prepared a summary of the journal article for presentation to the class in Part II. In Week Four, for Part II, you submitted a presentation of the journal article to the class via a discussion post. This week, for Part III, you will submit a written assignment that formally presents the journal article with your summation of the discussion from Week Four. You will submit your formal journal article review for grading by Day 7 this week.

Formal Report: The majority of your review should be focused on your analysis of the journal article. In your formal report:

·         Summarize the journal article.

·         Identify the key findings and issues as presented by the authors of journal article.

·         Summarize the recommendations of the authors.

·         Summarize the discussions with your peers from your Week Four discussion, “Homeland Security Influence: Part II.”

·         Analyze the article as it applies to the criminal justice policy issue. (This should be the main focus of your paper.)

Your journal article review must:

·         Be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

·         Include a separate title page with the following:

o    Title of paper

o    Student’s name

o    Course name and number

o    Instructor’s name

o    Date submitted

·         Use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text and in addition to the newspaper articles being evaluated.

·         Document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

·         Include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.